Ex parte HSU - Page 10




               Appeal No. 1999-0700                                                                         Page 10                 
               Application No. 08/590,580                                                                                           


               agglomerated particles to form a densified skin substantially free of protruding fiber ends and fibrils and          

               drying the agglomerated particles.  For example, shredded waste paper or smaller material, such as                   

               reclaimed cellulose fiber or waste paper processed through a fine screen, is a suitable starting material            

               (column 3, line 64, to column 4, line 2).  The phrase "reclaimed cellulose fiber" as used by Fleischer is a          

               general term which includes unused materials from primary tissue mills and other types of papermaking                

               processes and primarily contains short cellulose fibers which have passed through the forming wire of a              

               wet forming papermaking process (column 6, lines 14-19).                                                             

                       While Fleischer does disclose the use of processed waste paper and waste sludge from                         

               papermaking processes generally as starting materials in making useful product such as animal litter,                

               Fleischer does not specifically disclose the use of "recycled fiber sludge" as used by appellant (i.e.,              

               sludge from waste water derived from a plant that processes waste paper into recycled fiber).  Thus,                 

               from our perspective, Fleischer adds little to the teachings of Kok with regard to the claimed starting              

               material and, in any event, would not have suggested the use of "recycled fiber sludge" as required by               

               claim 9.                                                                                                             

                       Accordingly, we shall also reverse the examiner's rejection of claim 9 as being unpatentable                 

               over Kok in view of Fleischer.                                                                                       

                                                NEW GROUND OF REJECTION                                                             











Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007