PITHA V. MULLER et al. - Page 23




                 Interference 102,413                                                                                   Page 23                        
                 Pitha v. Muller                                                                                                                       
                 personal knowledge of the properties products produced in                                                                             
                 experiments W-14 and W-17 at the time of their production.                                                                            
                          Pitha argues the literature confirms the intrinsically                                                                       
                 amorphous nature of HPBCD and PBCD.  Specifically, Pitha cites                                                                        
                 exhibits PX-41 published September 1985, PX-54 published                                                                              
                 February 1986 and MCX-4 published October 1987.   These                             38                                                
                 exhibits were all published after April 25, 1984, which is                                                                            
                 after the accorded benefit date of Pitha.  Consequently, the                                                                          
                 articles are not available to establish Pitha’s appreciation                                                                          
                 of the properties of HPBCD and PBCD as of the time the                                                                                
                 experiments were performed.                                                                                                           
                          For the above reasons, and because proof of the existence                                                                    
                 of a physical embodiment within the scope of the count has not                                                                        
                 been shown, we cannot rely on the experimental evidentiary                                                                            
                 data which includes the products described in Dr. Ciesielski’s                                                                        
                 laboratory notebook, PX-27, as evidence of an actual reduction                                                                        
                 to practice.  This includes Dr. Czajkowska experiments C-160,                                                                         
                 C-161, C-162, C-166, C-170, C-171, C-172, C-173, C-174, C-207,                                                                        
                 C-231, C-250, C-252, C-253, C-254, C-256, C-258, C-259, C-260,                                                                        





                          38PB page 14, lines 8-19, page 15, lines 23-25 and page                                                                      
                 16, lines 17-21.                                                                                                                      





Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007