WEBER V. KAUFMAN et al. V. SCHECHTER - Page 2




                 Interference No. 103,449                                                                                                               

                                                               Junior Party.3                                                                           
                                                                _____________                                                                           

                                                              _______________                                                                           
                                                      Interference No. 103,449                                                                          
                                                              _______________                                                                           

                 Before METZ, PATE and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                            
                 PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     

                                   On June 20, 2000, an Order to Show Cause was mailed                                                                  
                 to junior party Weber that judgment would be entered against                                                                           
                 Weber for failure to file a record, unless Weber showed good                                                                           
                 cause why such judgment should not be issued.  Weber has not                                                                           
                 responded to the order.  Consequently, judgment is entered                                                                             
                 against junior party Weber on the ground of priority of                                                                                
                 invention hereinbelow.                                                                                                                 
                                   Also on June 20, 2000, an Order to Show Cause was                                                                    
                 mailed to parties Kaufman et al. and Schechter stating that                                                                            
                 judgment would be entered against both Kaufman et al. and                                                                              
                 Schechter for failure to establish priority of invention,                                                                              

                          3Patent No. 5,255,641, granted October 26, 1993, based on                                                                     
                 Application Serial No. 07/993,746, filed December 21, 1992.                                                                            
                 Accorded the benefit of Application Serial No. 07/720,115,                                                                             
                 filed June 24, 1991, now abandoned.  Assignor to Ford Motor                                                                            
                 Co.                                                                                                                                    
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007