Interference No. 103,449
unless Kaufman et al. and/or Schechter showed good cause why
such judgment should not be entered. In response to the
order, Schechter has conceded priority of invention.
Accordingly, the following judgment is entered.
Judgment
Judgment in Interference No. 103,449 is entered
against J. Roger Weber, a junior party. J. Roger Weber is not
entitled
to his claims 5, 8, and 10-20, which claims correspond to the
count in interference. Judgment is also entered against
Michael N. Schechter, a junior party. Michael N. Schechter is
not entitled to claims 1-10, which claims correspond to the
count in interference. Judgment is entered in favor of Warren
F. Kaufman and Michael N. Schechter, a junior party. Warren
F. Kaufman and Michael N. Schechter are entitled to a patent
containing claims 1-10, and 16-23, which claims correspond
to the count in interference.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007