Interference No. 103,833
Judgment under 37 CFR § 1.640(e)
(b) reissue claims 3, 26, and 31 are unpatentable5
under § 112 (Decision at 27-39, discussing Kean's Motion Nos.
15 and 16);
(c) reissue claims 9-11 are unpatentable under § 251
(Decision at 40-41, discussing Kean's Motion No. 19);
(d) patent claims 1-40 and reissue claims 1, 3-32,
and 35-40 are unpatentable over Camarota et al. U.S. Patent
5,144,166 (Camarota) and El Gamal et al. U.S. Patent No.
5,187,393 (El Gamal) (Decision at 49-51, discussing Kean's
Motion Nos. 7 and 8); and
(e) reissue claims 1, 3-8, 11, 12, 20-24, 27-29, and
35-38 are unpatentable for obviousness over Camarota in view
of Kean's International Publication No. WO 90/11648 (Decision
at 53-56, discussing Kean's Motion No. 17).
Claim 26 is incorrectly identified as claim 36 at page 275
of the decision. It is clear from the discussion at pages 35-36
that claim 26 was intended.
- 4 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007