Interference No. 103,833
Judgment under 37 CFR § 1.640(e)
2. Kean's claims
Judgment is hereby entered against Kean's involved
application claims 43-66, 71-73, and 75-82 on the following
grounds:
(a) claims 43-52 and 54 are unpatentable for
anticipation by Camarota and claim 53 is unpatentable for
obviousness over Camarota in view of El Gamal (Decision at 44-
45, discussing Ting's Motion C); and
(b) claims 55-66, 71-73, and 75-82 are unpatentable
for obviousness over Camarota in view of El Gamal (Decision at
45-49, discussing Ting's Motion E).
Judgment is, however, entered in favor of Kean's
involved claims 67 and 68, which were not held unpatentable in
- 5 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007