Ex Parte DUHAMEL - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2000-0206                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/699,328                                                  

                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellant's invention relates to a traffic sign.  A copy           
          of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the              
          appellant's brief.                                                          

               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Like                     1,517,439                Dec. 2, 1924              
          Lectric Lites Co. Catalog, page 6, item W3-1 (Lectric Lites)                


               Claims 5, 6, 11 to 13, 15 and 16 stand rejected under                  
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Lectric Lites in view            
          of Like.                                                                    

               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by           
          the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted                    
          rejection, we make reference to the answer (Paper No. 13, mailed            
          June 22, 1999) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support             
          of the rejection, and to the brief (Paper No. 10, filed October             
          19, 1998) and supplemental brief (Paper No. 12, filed April 5,              
          1999) for the appellant's arguments thereagainst.                           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007