The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte BRUCE A. HUNTER
__________
Appeal No. 2000-1623
Application 09/030,385
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to
5, all the claims in the application.
The claims on appeal recite an insert adapted to be
inserted in a T-shaped slot (claims 1 to 3 and 5), or a panel
assembly (claim 4), and are reproduced in the corrected
Appendix A filed on October 27, 2000.1
1We note that in claim 5, --can be-- apparently should be
inserted after “configuration” (line 3).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007