Ex parte HUNTER - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 2000-1623                                                                                                                   
                 Application 09/030,385                                                                                                                 




                          The references applied in the final rejection are:                                                                            
                 Johnstonbaugh             4,615,448               Oct.  7,                                                                             
                 1986                                                                                                                                   
                 Grossen                   5,138,803               Aug. 18,                                                                             
                 1992                                                                                                                                   
                          The appealed claims stand finally rejected on the                                                                             
                 following grounds:                                                                                                                     
                 (1) Claims 1 to 5, unpatentable over Johnstonbaugh in view of                                                                          
                 Grossen, under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).                                                                                                     
                 (2) Claims 4 and 5, unpatentable for failure to comply with 35                                                                         
                 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph.2                                                                                                       
                 Rejection (1)                                                                                                                          
                          Considering claim 1, the only independent claim, the                                                                          
                 examiner finds, in effect, that all the limitations of that                                                                            
                 claim are readable on Johnstonbaugh except for the requirement                                                                         
                 that the insert be “formed of resilient material”.  The                                                                                
                 examiner concludes, however, that the claimed subject matter                                                                           



                          2The final rejection states that this rejection applies                                                                       
                 to claims 1 to 5, but on page 4 of the answer the examiner                                                                             
                 agrees that it is only applicable to claims 4 and 5.                                                                                   
                                                                           2                                                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007