Ex Parte KEELER - Page 3




                    Appeal No. 2000-2064                                                                                                                                  
                    Application No. 08/781,412                                                                                                                            


                    "Electronic Traction Controller Systems Stop Spinout. . . "                                                                                           
                    Detroit Automotive ELECTRAC™ Brochure (undated), 2 pages.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                                                         
                              Claims 1, 2, 4 through 7, 9 and 10 stand rejected under                                                                                     
                    35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over RIDEWELL in view of                                                                                     
                    Brandt and ELECTRAC.                                                                                                                                  


                    OPINION                                                                                                                                               


                    In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given                                                                                                
                    careful consideration to appellant's specification and claims, to                                                                                     
                    the applied prior art references, and to the respective positions                                                                                     
                    articulated by appellant and the examiner.  As a consequence of                                                                                       
                    our review, we have made the determination which follows.                                                                                             


                    In rejecting claims 1, 2, 4 through 7, 9 and 10 under                                                                                                 
                    35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over RIDEWELL in view of                                                                                     
                    Brandt and ELECTRAC it is the examiner's position (answer, pages                                                                                      
                    4-6) that RIDEWELL discloses a tandem rear axle suspension system                                                                                     
                    comprising a drive axle suspension and a roll stable, non-drive                                                                                       
                    tag axle suspension, wherein both the drive axle suspension and                                                                                       
                    the non-drive tag axle suspension include an air spring (see the                                                                                      


                                                                                    33                                                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007