Appeal No. 2001-0401 Page 12
Application No. 09/019,451
Claims 2 and 3
We will not sustain the rejection of claims 2 and 3 under
35 U.S.C. § 103.
The appellant acknowledges (brief, p. 18) that the work
table 16 of Gonzalez satisfies the recitation in claim 1 of a
first storage shelf. The appellant then argues (brief, pp.6
18-19) that the cooler tray plate 35 of Gonzalez is not
readable on the second storage shelf recited in claim 2. We 7
6Claim 1 includes the limitation "a first storage shelf
pivotally disposed on said support frame between said first
and second ends, said first storage shelf selectively movable
between a stowed position wherein said first storage shelf is
oriented alongside a longitudinal axis of said support frame
and an extended position wherein said first storage shelf is
oriented at an angle relative to the longitudinal axis such
that said first storage shelf may receivably support a first
container for said implements."
7Claim 2 reads as follows:
A mobile storage unit according to claim 1 including
a second storage shelf pivotally disposed on said support
frame between said first and second ends, said second
storage shelf selectively movable between a stowed
position wherein said second storage shelf is oriented
alongside the longitudinal axis and an extended position
wherein said second storage shelf is oriented at an angle
relative to the longitudinal axis such that said second
storage shelf may receivably support a second container
for said implements.
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007