Appeal No. 2001-0401 Page 13
Application No. 09/019,451
agree. In that regard, the appellant's argument is tantamount
to an argument that Gonzalez does not disclose the first and
second storage shelves as recited in claims 1 and 2. In our
view, the cooler tray plate 35 of Gonzalez is not selectively
movable between a stowed position wherein the cooler tray
plate is oriented alongside a longitudinal axis of the support
fram and an extended position wherein the cooler tray plate is
oriented at an angle relative to the longitudinal axis such
that the cooler tray plate may receivably support receivably
support a container for implements when in its extended
position (shown in Figure 1) due to the pivotal mounting
thereof. The examiner has failed to provide any explanation
has to how the cooler tray plate 35 of Gonzalez is readable on
either the first storage shelf of claim 1 or the second 8
storage shelf of claim 2.
8We agree with the appellant that the first storage shelf
limitation of claim 1 is readable on the work table 16 of
Gonzalez.
Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007