The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID A. OSTERBERG, TOREN S. DAVIS and CONOR D. JOHNSON
____________
Appeal No. 2001-0472
Application No. 09/153,951
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to
allow claims 19 to 24, as amended subsequent to the final
rejection. These claims constitute all of the claims pending1
in this application.
1While the examiner has approved entry of the amendment
after final rejection (Paper No. 6, filed May 19, 2000), we
note that this amendment has not been clerically entered.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007