Ex parte GORE - Page 1




                               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                                       for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         
                                                                                                Paper No. 29              
                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                      ____________                                                        
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                      ____________                                                        
                                             Ex parte DAVID ROMAN GORE                                                    
                                                      ____________                                                        
                                                  Appeal No. 2001-1886                                                    
                                                Application No. 09/166,713                                                
                                                      ____________                                                        
                                                        ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                      ____________                                                        
              Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
              ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        




                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claim 22.  Claims                
              11-13, 18, 23, 24, 28 and 29 have been allowed, and claims 5, 25 and 27 have been                           
              objected to.  The remaining claims have been cancelled.                                                     


              WE REVERSE.                                                                                                 











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007