The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JONATHAN S. ROSE, KENNETH T. PICONE,
and THOMAS G. ORE
____________
Appeal No. 2001-1895
Application No. 09/235,180
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 6 and 7,
as amended after the final rejection. Claims 1-5 have been allowed and claims 8-12 have
been withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected species.
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007