LAGRANGE et al v. KONRAD et al - Page 18




                 Patent Interference No. 103,548                                                                                                  
                 the presumed prior art. There must be no difference between them as viewed by a                                                  
                 person of ordinary skill in the art.                                                                                             
                         Konrad claim 4 provides for a generic formula that encompasses C2-C4 alkyl N-                                            
                 substituted indolines but also covers many other indolines. The fact that a claimed                                              
                 compound may be encompassed by a generic formula does not by itself render that                                                  
                 compound anticipated. See In re Jones, 958 F.2d 347, 21 USPQ2d 1941 (Fed. Cir.                                                   
                 1992). Here, given the vast number of indolines encompassed by the Konrad formula,                                               
                 we are find that Konrad does not describe Lagrange's C2-C4 alkyl N-substituted                                                   
                 indolines. Accordingly, the C2-C4 alkyl N-substituted indolines are not anticipated by                                           
                 Konrad claim 4.                                                                                                                  

                         The parties were requested to brief the anticipation question in light of the                                            
                 cases27 in the Commissioner's Notice of April 17, 199528, 1174 OG 68 (May 9, 1995),                                              
                 entitled In re Baird, as well as In re Taub, 348 F.2d 556, 146 USPQ 384 (CCPA 1965).                                             
                         Both parties have assessed the case law on the subject of genus/species and                                              
                 agree that a broad generic disclosure that encompasses a claimed invention may                                                   
                 constitute a “description” of that claim within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) if there                                       

                                                                                                                                                  
                 27 The cases are: In re Baird, 16 F.3d 380, 29 USPQ2d 1550 (Fed. Cir. 1994); In re Bell, 991 F.2d 781, 26                        
                 USPQ2d 1529 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Jones, 958 F.2d 347, 21 USPQ2d 1941 (Fed. Cir. 1992; Merck &                                 
                 Co. v. Biocraft Labs., 874 F.2d 804, 10 USPQ2d 1843 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 975 (1989); In re                        
                 Susi, 440 F.2d 442, 169 USPQ 423 (CCPA 1971); In re Lemin, 332 F.2d 839, 141 USPQ 814 (CCPA                                      
                 1964); In re Rosicky, 276 F.2d 656, 125 USPQ 341 (CCPA 1960).                                                                    
                 28 From this Notice derived the interim Genus-Species Guidelines to assist Office personnel in examining                         
                 claims to a chemical species where a single prior art reference discloses a genus that encompasses the                           
                 claimed species (see Commissioner's Notice of February 5, 1997, 1196 OG 37; also Consolidated Listing                            
                 of Official Gazette Notices Re-Patent and Trademark Office Practices and Procedures, 1218 OG 110-116                             
                 and MPEP 2144.08).                                                                                                               


                                                                                                                             18                   



Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007