Interference 103,685
of the monomers thereof or blends thereof dyed with
an aqueous mixture of a carrier and a dye soluble
or dispersed in a dyebath, the carrier comprising
N,N-diethyl(m-toluamide), an emulsifier, and a
flame retardant.
Holsten’s patent Claim 31
A fiber according to claim 30 wherein the
emulsifier is a blend of the free acid form of a
phosphated ethoxylated dialkyl phenol containing
from about 2 to 20 moles of ethylene oxide and a
non-ionic propoxylated-ethoxylated alcohol containing
from about 20 to 75 moles of propylene oxide and 20
to 75 moles of ethylene oxide.
The claims of the parties originally designated as
corresponding to Count 1 are (Paper No. 1 (Notice Declaring
Interference), p. 19):
Riggins et al. application: Claims 1-13 and 65-68
Holsten et al. application: Claims 1, 3-12, 15-19,
23, 24, 26-32, 35-40,
43, 45-49 and 52.
Holsten et al. patent: Claims 1-39.
December 2, 1996 - Riggins filed Riggins’ Preliminary
Motion 1 under 37 CFR § 1.633(a) for judgment that Claims 1,
3-6, 8-12, 15, 16, 18, 19, 23, 24, 26-29, 31, 32, 35, 36,
38-40, 43, 45-48 and 52 of Holsten’s involved application
are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph (Paper
No. 19).
December 2, 1996 - Riggins filed Riggins’ Preliminary
Motion 2 under 37 CFR § 1.633(c)(1) to redefine the interfering
-11-
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007