Interference 103,685
of Riggins’ involved application are unpatentable to Riggins
under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 over Kelly, U.S. Patent 4,525,168,
patented June 25, 1985 (Holsten’s Exhibit 2 (HX 2))(Paper
No. 27).
December 2, 1996 - Holsten filed Holsten’s Preliminary
Motion 3 under 37 CFR § 1.633(c)(4) to redefine the interfering
subject matter by designating Claims 1-39 of Holsten’s patent as
not corresponding to the count (Paper No. 28).
February 7, 1997 - Riggins filed Riggins’ Preliminary
Motion 7 under 37 CFR § 1.633(i) to redefine the interfering
subject matter by amending Claims 65-68 of Riggins’ involved
application and designating Claims 65-68 of Riggins’ involved
application, as amended, as corresponding either to Count 1 or
to proposed Count 2 (Paper No. 37).3
3
At pages 30-31 of the Memorandum Opinion and Order
(Paper No. 83), there is stated (footnote incorporated):
3. Riggins’ response to Holsten Preliminary
Motion 1 is Riggins Preliminary Motion 7, filed
pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.633(i), seeking to amend
Riggins ‘405 claims 65-68. Pursuant to a pre-hearing
request, Riggins has submitted a proposed amendment
(Riggins Exhibit 13 [(Paper No. 22 in the file of
Riggins ‘405)] which requests that:
a. claims 65-68 be canceled from Riggins ‘405
“without prejudice” and
b. claims 78-81 (in place of claims 65-68,
as proposed to be amended) be added to
Riggins ‘405.
-14-
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007