The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JACK A. ROTH, TAPAS MUKOPADHYAY,
and MICHAEL TAINSKY
__________
Appeal No. 1996-2756
Application No. 07/987,235
__________
ON BRIEF1
__________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ADAMS and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 12, 13, 16, 25 and 30-32, which are all the claims pending in
the application.
1 We note appellants waived (Paper No. 32, received March 20, 2001) their request
for oral hearing (Paper No. 28, received July 7, 1995). Accordingly, we considered
this appeal on Brief.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007