Ex parte ROTH et al. - Page 5


                  Appeal No.  1996-2756                                                                                        
                  Application No.  07/987,235                                                                                  
                  will contribute to anti-message inhibition.  Therefore, the examiner concludes (id.)                         
                  that:                                                                                                        
                          given the teachings of the cited prior art the ordinary artisan at the                               
                          time of the instant invention would have been provided a reasonable                                  
                          expectation of success in making an antisense RNA molecule and a                                     
                          nucleic acid molecule to which selectively inhibits the K-ras oncogene,                              
                          where the antisense oligonucleotides comprising oligonucleotides to                                  
                          exons II and III, and intron II of the p21 K-ras oncogene.                                           
                          In response to the examiner’s rejection, appellants argue (Brief, page 5) that                       
                  the cited references fail to suggest the recited intronic and exonic elements of the                         
                  appealed claims.  In addition, appellants argue (id.) that “the prior art indicates that                     
                  a solution to the problem of target specificity lies in providing specially-engineered,                      
                  compensatory constructs that are not affected by antisense treatment, not in                                 
                  providing antisense constructs that discriminate between mutant and normal forms                             
                  of the target gene.”                                                                                         
                          As set forth in Ecolochem Inc. v. Southern California Edison, 227 F.3d 1361,                         
                  1375, 56 USPQ2d 1065, 1075 (CAFC 2000) the:                                                                  
                                 “[S]uggestion to combine may be found in explicit or implicit                                 
                          teachings within the references themselves, from the ordinary                                        
                          knowledge of those skilled in the art, or from the nature of the problem                             
                          to be solved.” … However, there still must be evidence that “a skilled                               
                          artisan, confronted with the same problems as the inventor and with                                  
                          no knowledge of the claimed invention, would select the elements                                     
                          from the cited prior art references for combination in the manner                                    
                          claimed.” … “[A] rejection cannot be predicated on the mere                                          
                          identification … of individual components of claimed limitations.                                    
                          Rather particular findings must be made as to the reason the skilled                                 
                          artisan, with no knowledge of the claimed invention, would have                                      
                          selected these components for combination in the manner                                              
                          claimed.”….  [Citations omitted].                                                                    




                                                              5                                                                



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007