Ex Parte CARIDEI - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1996-4111                                                        
          Application No. 08/311,902                                                  



          success.  The Randles declaration clearly does not refer to any             
          evidence that commercial tools, such as the pricing and/or                  
          advertising, were not responsible for obtaining the alleged                 
          commercial success.  This lack of nexus between the claimed                 
          invention and the alleged commercial success is further                     
          buttressed by the fact that claim 15, as recited, does not                  
          require battery terminal connectors to have a color coded                   
          coating.                                                                    
               With respect to the alleged fulfillment of a long-felt need            
          and failure of others, the Randles declaration refers to the                
          advertisements designated in the Invention Disclosure Statement             
          as “AR”, “AS”, and “AT”.  These advertisements indicate that                
          certain metal plated battery terminal connectors have increased             
          corrosion resistance.  However, the advertisements do not                   
          indicate that these metal plated battery terminal connectors were           
          not useful for solving the existing corrosion problem.  In re               
          Mixon, 470 F.2d 1374, 1377, 176 USPQ 296, 299 (CCPA 1973).  Nor             














Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007