Appeal No. 1996-4111
Application No. 08/311,902
proffered by appellant. Thus, we affirm the decision of the
examiner rejecting all of the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103.
As a final point, we note that the examiner did not indicate
whether the formal drawings filed on April 2, 1992 meet the
written description requirement of the first paragraph of
35 U.S.C. § 112. In the event of further prosecution of this
application, the examiner is advised to determine whether the
newly introduced formal drawings violate the written description
requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
Chung K. Pak )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007