Appeal No. 1996-4148
Application No. 08/327,085
the claim.” In re Hiniker Co., 150 F.3d 1362, 1369, 47 USPQ2d
1523, 1529 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
Turning first to Appellant's claim 1, we note that the
claim recites at section (b), ". . . a plurality of video
displays set in a carrousel . . ., . . . each display
presented on a page within the carrousel . . ., the boundary
of the page having an axial edge facing the center of the
carrousel with the page
extending radially outward from the axial edge . . . ." Claim
1,
at section (c), provides ". . . an axis at the center of the
carrousel . . . ." Thus, Appellant's claim 1 requires a
carrousel held display of pages attached to a common axis in
the middle of the carrousel, and the rotation of the pages
around the axis within the carrousel.
Claim 18 recites ". . . representing each of the
selectable items as a separate representative image on a page
. . ., arranging the pages into a three dimensional icon with
one edge of the pages attached to a common axis in the middle
10
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007