The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte LIVIO BALDI
______________
Appeal No. 1997-3532
Application 08/411,385
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before PAK, WARREN and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
We have carefully considered the record in this appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134, including the
opposing views of the examiner, in the answer, and appellant, in the brief and reply brief,1 and based on
our review, find that we cannot sustain the grounds of rejection of appealed claims 1, 2 and 4 through
1 We have considered the brief filed July 19, 1996 (Paper No. 30). We have not considered the
declaration under 37 CFR § 1.132 filed with the brief as the examiner refused entry thereof in the
advisory action of September 27, 1995 (Paper No. 24).
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007