Ex parte REYNOLDS - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1998-0234                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08,406,752                                                                                                             


                 (German Patent)1                                                                                                                       

                 Claims 38 through 41, 43 and 60 stand rejected under                                                                                   
                 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for                                                                             
                 failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim that                                                                            
                 which appellant regards as his invention.  According to the                                                                            
                 examiner (answer, page 4), the areas of indefiniteness are as                                                                          
                 follows:                                                                                                                               
                          [i]n claims 38 and 43, line 12, "based" should be                                                                             
                          "base."  In claim 43, line 1, "assemble" should be                                                                            
                          "assembly."  In claim 60, line 4, there is no                                                                                 
                          antecedent basis for "the shelf area.”                                                                                        

                 In addition to the foregoing rejection, the appealed                                                                                   
                 claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows:                                                                                


                 a) claims 1 through 3, 6, 8, 9, 12 through 16, 28 through                                                                              
                 30, 38 through 54 and 56 through 60 under § 103 as being                                                                               
                 unpatentable over Boggess in view of Kornelson;                                                                                        



                          1Our understanding of this foreign language document is                                                                       
                 based on a translation prepared for the U.S. Patent and                                                                                
                 Trademark Office.  A copy of that translation is appended to                                                                           
                 this decision.                                                                                                                         

                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007