The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 60
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MORAND LAMBLA, RAPHAEL MESTANZA SCHIL, DAR-JONG LIN, ERIC
VANDEVIJVER and MARIE-PAULE COLLARD
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0522
Application No. 08/327,882
____________
HEARD: October 25, 2001
____________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1, 3, 9 through 11 and 20.
Claims 12 through 19 stand withdrawn by the examiner as being
directed to a non-elected invention. Claim 21 has been indicated
as allowed by the examiner.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007