Ex Parte LAMBLA et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-0522                                                        
          Application No. 08/327,882                                                  


               Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal and          
          reads as follows:                                                           
               1.  A polyphenylene sulphide composition consisting of 60 to           
          99.5% by weight of polyphenylene sulphide and 0.5 to 40% by weight          
          of a crosslinked composition (C) consisting essentially of:                 
               a compound (C1), consisting of an elastomeric copolymer                
          derived from at least one olefin and at least one comonomer (1)             
          containing at least one epoxy group and at least one ethylenically          
          unsaturated radical, and at least one other unsaturated comonomer           
          (2), an alkyl ester of an ",$-unsaturated carboxylic acid, and              
               a polymeric crosslinking agent (C2), consisting of a copolymer         
          of an olefin and of at least one comonomer (3) selected from the            
          group consisting of unsaturated carboxylic acids and carboxylic             
          acid anhydride groups derived from these acids, and at least one            
          other unsaturated comonomer (2') selected from alkyl esters of an           
          ",$-unsaturated carboxylic acid, said crosslinking agent (C2)               
          being crosslinked with said compound (C1).                                  
               In support of her rejections, the examiner relies on the               
          following prior art references:                                             
          Kadoi et al. (Kadoi)          0 345 094 A1        Dec. 6, 1989              
          (Published European Patent Application)                                     
          Masamoto et al. (Masamoto)    0 406 553 A2        Jan. 9, 1991              
          (Published European Patent Application)                                     
               Claims 1, 3, 9 through 11 and 20 stand rejected under 35               
          U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the disclosure of Masamoto.               
          Claims 1, 3, 9 through 11 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 103 as unpatentable over the disclosure of Kadoi.                         
               Having carefully reviewed the claims, specification, applied           
          prior art, including all of the arguments advanced by the examiner          

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007