Ex parte BALL - Page 15




          Appeal No. 1998-0752                                                        
          Application 08/389,096                                                      


          output goes high to indicate a rising slope, the other                      
          comparator output goes high to indicate a falling slope;                    
          should both outputs be low, the result is interpreted as no                 
          change (Figures 4 and 6).  Toyama does not teach the ability                
          to set a numerical difference between adjacent normalized                   
          samples that will be defined as the threshold between rising                
          slope and no slope, or between no slope and falling slope.                  
          Thus, we will not sustain the rejection of claim 10 under 35                
          U.S.C. § 103.                                                               
               In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner                 
          rejecting claims 9, 11, and 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is                     
          affirmed; the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-4,                
          8, and 10 under U.S.C. § 103, however, is reversed.                         














                                          15                                          





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007