Ex Parte DEHAVEN et al - Page 9



          Appeal No. 1998-0908                                                        
          Application No. 08/506,292                                                  

          1440, 1444, 221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir.); cert. dismissed,                 
          468 U.S. 1228 (1984); W.L. Gore & Assocs. v. Garlock, Inc.,                 
          721 F.2d 1540, 1554, 220 USPQ 303, 313 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert.              
          denied, 469 U.S. 851 (1984).                                                
               With respect to the reliance on King '241 as the basis for             
          the 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) rejection, the Examiner attempts (Answer,            
          page 5) to read the various limitations of the appealed claims              
          on the disclosure of King '241.  In the Examiner’s view, the                
          testing arrangement of King '241, which includes product wafer              
          12, compliant interconnect 13, 16, and test wafer 20, meets all             
          of the fundamental limitations of the claims on appeal.                     
          Similarly, with respect to King '405, the Examiner makes                    
          particular reference to the description beginning at column 5,              
          line 65 of the embodiment illustrated in Figures 8-11.  According           
          to the Examiner, this embodiment of King '405 discloses opposing            
          product and test wafers mounted across an elastomer interconnect            
          as claimed by Appellants.                                                   
               After reviewing the King '241 and King '405 references,                











Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007