Ex parte EDGINGTON et al. - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not      
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board       
                                                                                       
                                                             Paper No. 27              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                     ____________                                      
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                      
                           Ex parte GARRY J. EDGINGTON and                             
                                 CHRISTOPHER M. RYAN                                   
                                    _____________                                      
                                 Appeal No. 1998-1007                                  
                              Application No. 08/499,079                               
                                    _____________                                      



            Before OWENS, TIMM, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent                 
            Judges.                                                                    
                                                                                       
            PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                  


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                 This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection                 
            of claims 44-52.  Claims 53-62, the only other remaining                   
            claims in the application, have been allowed.  See the                     
            Second Advisory Action mailed on July 25, 1997 (Paper No.                  
            20).                                                                       

                                    THE INVENTION                                      
                 Claim 44 is illustrative of appellants’ invention, and                
            is reproduced below:                                                       
                       44.  A method of tackifying a hot melt                          
                 thermoplastic composition comprising adding an                        
                 effective tackifying amount of a polyester material                   






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007