Ex parte EDGINGTON et al. - Page 2


            Appeal No. 1998-1006                                                       
            Application No. 08/499079                                                  

                 comprising greater than 5 mole% of lactic acid having                 
                 a molecular weight (Mn) less than about 30,000 grams                  
                 per mole and Tg less than 110°C to the thermoplastic.                 
                 [emphasis added]                                                      
                                    THE REFERENCES                                     
            Moss (Moss)          1,849,107           March 15, 1932                    
            British Celanese  311,657 GB             August 13, 1930                   

                                    THE REJECTION                                      
                 Claims 44-52 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                    
            paragraph 1 (enablement).                                                  
                 Claims 44-52 stand rejected as unpatentable under 35                  
            U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by, or in the alternative                   
            under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Moss or British                   
            Celanese.                                                                  

                                       OPINION                                         
                 We have carefully considered all of the arguments                     
            advanced by appellants and the examiner and agree with                     
            appellants that the aforementioned rejections are not well                 
            founded.  Accordingly, we reverse each of the above-                       
            mentioned rejections.                                                      

            I. The Rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph 1                        

                 The first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112, with regard to                
            enablement, requires that the specification enable a person                
            having ordinary skill in the art to make and use the                       
            claimed invention.  Further, enablement requires that the                  
            specification teach those having ordinary skill in the art                 
            to make and use the invention without “undue                               


                                           2                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007