Ex Parte PORTOGHESE et al - Page 5


             Appeal No. 1998-1489                                                                                     
             Application No. 08/449,224                                                                               
                    presumption these acids were neither obvious nor known.  The ‘417 and ‘249                        
                    patents [Dappen ‘417 and Dappen ‘249] evidence undue experimentation … was                        
                    required to obtain these materials.  Dappen ‘249 generically claims the acid                      
                    intermediate where X is O based partly on an application filed Feb. 24, 1993,                     
                    also before appellants’ parent filing date.  The acid compounds where X is O are                  
                    also prima facie novel and unobvious.  (Examiner’s Answer, paragraph bridging                     
                    pages 4 and 5).                                                                                   

             Based on the Dappen patents, the examiner concludes that “key intermediates, starting                    
             materials for instantly claimed products were not in fact available” (Examiner’s Answer,                 
             Page 5, last paragraph).  The examiner cites In re Howarth, 654 F.2d 103, 210 USPQ                       
             689 (CCPA 1981), as “in point” without further comment or analysis (Examiner’s                           
             Answer, paragraph bridging pages 5 and 6).                                                               
                    In Howarth, the issue centered on the availability of a starting material, clavulanic             
             acid, essential to making the claimed derivatives of clavulanic acid.  Howarth’s                         
             specification provided no information enabling persons skilled in the art to prepare                     
             clavulanic acid, or directing them to reference materials containing such information.                   
             Nevertheless, Howarth relied on copies of patent specifications, which had been open                     
             for inspection in Rhodesia, Panama, and Luxemburg before his U.S. filing date, as                        
             describing the preparation of clavulanic acid.  The solicitor replied that                               
                    Regardless of what the documents are called and regardless of the technical                       
                    possibility of obtaining copies from the respective government offices, there is no               
                    evidence of actual dissemination to the public of the documents containing the                    
                    specifications, nor is there any index, catalog or other customary research tool or               
                    even a descriptive title that would lead one of ordinary skill to the documents for               
                    information on the preparation of clavulanic acid.  Therefore, the documents may                  
                    not be relied on to supplement appellant’s disclosure [In re Howarth, 654 F.2d at                 
                    105, 210 USPQ at 691].                                                                            






                                                          5                                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007