The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LANNY D. SCHMIDT
and
MARYLIN HUFF
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1567
Application No. 08/636,816
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WARREN, OWENS, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner
refusing to allow claims 1, 3 and 9 through 20, which are all the claims pending in this
case.1
THE INVENTION
The invention is directed to a process for the production of a mono-olefin from
1It is stated in the Brief, page 2 that, “THE APPEAL OF CLAIM 2 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN.”
Accordingly, we vacate the appeal of claim 2.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007