Ex parte VINOGRADOV et al. - Page 16


                  Appeal No.  1998-2107                                                                                     
                  Application No.  08/137,624                                                                               
                  note appellants’ arguments (Brief, page 19-20) against this rejection.  Conspicuous                       
                  by its absence from this record, however, is the examiner’s response to appellants’                       
                  arguments.                                                                                                
                         As stated in In re Hedges, 783 F.2d 1038, 1039, 228 USPQ 685, 686 (Fed.                            
                  Cir. 1986) “[i]f a prima facie case is made in the first instance, and if the applicant                   
                  comes forward with reasonable rebuttal, whether buttressed by experiment, prior art                       
                  references, or argument, the entire merits of the matter are to be reweighed.”                            
                  Accord In re Rinehart, 531 F.2d 1048, 1052, 189 USPQ 143, 147 (CCPA                                       
                  1976)(“[w]hen prima facie obviousness is established and evidence is submitted in                         
                  rebuttal, the decision-maker must start over”).                                                           


























                                                             16                                                             



Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007