The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte NURGUN ERDOL
and
FENG BAO
__________
Appeal No. 1998-2379
Application No. 08/315,942
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and DIXON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final
rejection of claims 21, 31 to 33, and 36 to 39. Claims 1
through 20 have been allowed, and claims 22 to 30, 34,
35, 40 and 41 are objected to as being dependent upon a
rejected base
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007