Ex Parte TANAKA et al - Page 2




                Appeal No. 1998-2479                                                                                                           
                Application 08/419,512                                                                                                         



                drives a tracking actuating means to maintain said optical pickup at a predetermined                                           
                position opposite to a recording surface of an optical information storing medium;                                             
                         nonvolatile memory means for storing a compensatory value corresponding to                                            
                differences of servo characteristics of at least either a focus servo control apparatus or                                     
                a tracking servo control apparatus, said value being determined through use of external                                        
                measurement means and stored when said memory means is incorporated into the                                                   
                optical disk apparatus with said optical pickup; and                                                                           
                         compensation means for compensating either said focus error signal or said                                            
                tracking error signal according to said compensatory values stored in said nonvolatile                                         
                memory means.                                                                                                                  

                         The examiner has relied upon the following references:                                                                
                Minami                                    4,707,648                         Nov. 17, 1987                                      
                Hofer et al. (Hofer)                      4,942,564                         July   17, 1990                                    
                Horie et al. (Horie)                      5,048,002                         Sept. 10, 1991                                     
                Suzuki                                    5,097,458                         Mar.  17, 1992                                     
                                                                                    (filed May 22, 1990)                                       
                         Claims 1, 2, and 4 through 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence                                       
                of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Suzuki alone.  Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 and 10                                            
                through 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Minami.                                             
                Claims 1, 2, 7 and 10 through 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                                              
                anticipated by Horie.  Finally, claims 24 through 26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                            
                § 102(b) as being anticipated by Hofer.                                                                                        






                                                                      2                                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007