The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 64
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MICHAEL P. DEFRANK and ROBERT J. ROSATI
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-2823
Application No. 08/458,010
______________
HEARD: December 05, 2000
_______________
Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges
GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 8, 9, 15, 17, 18, 20 through 22, 26, 27
and 32 through 51. Claims 1 through 7, 10 through 14, 16, 19,
23 through 25 and 28 through 31 have been canceled. In the
advisory action mailed March 25, 1997 (Paper No. 40), the
examiner has
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007