Ex parte DEFRANK et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1998-2823                                                        
          Application No. 08/458,010                                                  


          material” (emphasis supplied) set forth, for example, in                    
          independent claims 17, 26 and 40.  See answer, p. 6.                        
               The examiner also determined that the terminology                      
          “energy,” “energy detector,” “received energy,” “energy                     
          conducting passage,” and “energy conducting member” lack                    
          antecedent basis because only electromagnetic or infrared                   
          energy is described in the original disclosure.  Likewise, the              
          examiner determined that the language “insulation means” and                
          “replaceable elements” lack antecedent basis because only an                
          air gap insulation means and a replaceable window and sleeve,               
          respectively, are described in the original disclosure.                     
          Finally, the examiner believes the terminology “first                       
          position” to lack antecedent basis in the disclosure.  See                  
          answer, p. 7.                                                               





               We understand the examiner’s characterization of the                   
          claim terminology “brittle,” “energy,” “energy detector,”                   
          “first                                                                      
          position,” “received energy,” “energy conducting passage,”                  
                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007