Ex parte MERTES et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 16              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
              Ex parte HARALD MERTES, JOSEF PEDAIN and REINHARD HALPAAP               
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1998-3145                                  
                               Application 08/432,285                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before OWENS, JEFFREY T. SMITH and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative              
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of               
          claims 1-8, which are all of the claims in the application.                 
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward a                 
          process for making a polyisocyanate containing allophanate                  

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007