The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KATSUJI IGARASHI, JUN YONEMITSU,
YOICHI YAGASAKI, YASUSHI FUJINAMI,
TOMOYUKI SATO, MOTOKI KATO,
and TERUHIKO SUZUKI
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0089
Application No. 08/454,076
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the final rejection of claims 18 and 38-42. We affirm-
in-part.
BACKGROUND
A scheduled oral hearing was waived. (Paper No. 24.)1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007