Ex parte MURAYAMA et al. - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being                           
               entered today was not written for publication                          
               and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             
                                                               Paper No. 18           


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                  ________________                                    
                     Ex parte YUICHIRO MURAYAMA, MASAKI SATAKE,                       
                         HIROSHI HASHIMOTO and TSUTOMU OKITA                          
                                  ________________                                    
                                Appeal No. 1999-0097                                  
                             Application No. 08/532,976                               
                                  ________________                                    
                                HEARD:  May 23, 2001                                  
                                  ________________                                    

          Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative                  
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        



                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1,                
          2, 7, 8, 13 and 14.  Claims 4, 6, 11, 12 and 17-20, the other               
          claims remaining in the present application, have been                      
          objected to by the examiner as being based upon a rejected                  
          base claim.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                       
                                         -1-                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007