Ex parte MURAYAMA et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 1999-0097                                                        
          Application No. 08/532,976                                                  


          cyclohexane ring," it is well settled that the burden of                    
          demonstrating unexpected results rests upon the party                       
          asserting them.  In re Klosak, 455 F.2d 1077, 1080, 173 USPQ                
          14, 16 (CCPA 1972).  Furthermore, appellants have not                       
          established on this record that the specification results                   
          would be considered truly unexpected by one of ordinary skill               
          in the art.  In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 1099, 231 USPQ               
          375, 381 (Fed. Cir. 1986).                                                  
               In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner's                  
          decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed.                         
               No time period for taking any subsequent action in                     
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                    
          § 1.136(a).                                                                 
                                      AFFIRMED                                        



                         EDWARD C. KIMLIN              )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                         BRADLEY R. GARRIS             ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )   APPEALS AND                
                                                       )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                         -8-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007