Ex parte INABA - Page 3




         Appeal No. 1999-0112                                    Page 3          
         Application No. 08/693,614                                              


         filed July 6, 1998) and reply brief (Paper No. 18, filed                
         October 16, 1998) for the appellant's arguments thereagainst.           


                                     OPINION                                     
              In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given             
         careful consideration to the appellant's specification and              
         claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the                 
         respective positions articulated by the appellant and the               
         examiner.  As a consequence of our review, we make the                  
         determinations which follow.                                            


                             NEW GROUND OF REJECTION                             
              Under the authority of 37 CFR § 1.196(b), this panel of            
         the Board introduces the following new ground of rejection as           
         to claims 5 through 8.                                                  


              Claims are considered to satisfy the requirements in the           
         second paragraph of § 112 if they define the metes and bounds           
         of the claimed subject matter with a reasonable degree of               
         precision and particularity.  See In re Venezia, 530 F.2d 956,          
         958, 189 USPQ 149, 151 (CCPA 1976).                                     







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007