Appeal No. 1999-0294
Application No. 08/727,256
unpatentable over Arroyo in view of Solomon.
Reference is made to the brief and answer for the
respective positions of appellant and the examiner.
OPINION
We reverse.
The primary reference to Arroyo was cited in the instant
specification as being indicative of systems that require the
memory controller to be modified to include specialized
hardware for testing the ECC logic embedded therein. As
pointed out in the specification, page 3, these systems were
deemed, by appellant, to be deficient in failing to provide a
universal system for testing the ECC capabilities of
unmodified ECC memory controllers.
It is the examiner’s position that Arroyo discloses a
method of verifying ECC capabilities of a memory controller
wherein the memory controller controls access to a memory
3–
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007