Ex Parte TSARFATY et al - Page 4




              Appeal No. 1999-0339                                                                                      
              Application 07/903,588                                                                                    
                     The examiner has premised his conclusion with respect to the obviousness of                        
              claim 1 on the teachings of Bièche.                                                                       
                     To that end, we find that Bièche discloses studies wherein a c-met proto-                          
              oncogene probe (pmetH) which detects met gene sequences on chromosome 7q31, is                            
              used to analyze tumor and blood leukocyte DNA samples in patients with primary                            
              breast cancers.  Bièche, p. 139, col. 1, para. 1, p. 140, cols. 1-2.  The pmetH probe                     
              recognizes TaqI restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) of 7.5 kb (L                             
              fragment) and 4.0 kb (S fragment) in tumor and lymphocyte DNA of patients with                            
              primary breast cancer.  Bièche, p. 140, cols. 1-2.  Bièche found that of 245 patients, 81                 
              were homozygous for the L fragment (LL genotype), 43 were homozygous for the S                            
              fragment (SS) and 121 were heterozygous (LS).  Bièche, p. 140, col. 2, para. 1.  Bièche                   
              analyzed blood leukocyte and tumor DNA from those patients who are heterozygous                           
              (LS) with the pmetH probe and found a loss of heterozygosity of the c-met proto-                          
              oncogene in 49 of the 121 (40.5%) patients.  Id., para. 2; see also Figure 1.  In follow-                 
              up studies, Bièche found that the loss of heterozygosity was associated with                              
              “significantly higher risk of relapse (55% vs 21%) and of death (41% vs 15%)” and                         
              “reduced metastasis-free (p+ 0.00022) and overall (p+0.0036) survival” compared with                      
              patients who did not have the DNA deletion.  Bièche, p. 142, col. 1., para. 2 and p. 141,                 
              sentence bridging cols. 1-2.  Bièche noted that the “frequency of [the] c-met deletion                    
              may be underestimated because of cellular heterogeneity of tumour biopsy material.”                       
              Bièche, p. 142, col. 1, para. 2.                                                                          

                                                           4                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007