Ex parte RHODEN et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 30              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte WILLIAM D. RHODEN                               
                                 and RAJEEV JAYAVANT                                  
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1999-0466                                  
                               Application 08/530,617                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO and LALL, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-17, which                   
          constitute all the claims in the application.  In response to               
          appellants’ brief on appeal, the examiner has indicated that                
          claims 3-17 are allowable over the prior art of record                      
          [answer, page 2].  Therefore, this appeal is now directed to                

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007