Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte UCHIDA et al. - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2001 > Ex parte UCHIDA et al. - Page 1

          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                   publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.             

                                                            Paper No. 22              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                             Ex parte YASUHIRO UCHIDA,                                
                                   TAKASHI KOJIMA,                                    
                                  MASAHIRO HAMAYA,                                    
                                        and                                           
                                     MINORU OTA                                       
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1999-0555                                  
                             Application No. 08/593,330                               
                                   ______________                                     
                             HEARD: NOVEMBER 29, 2001                                 
                                   _______________                                    
          Before GARRIS, LIEBERMAN, and TIMM, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the refusal of the                
          examiner to allow claims 1-11 as amended subsequent to the                  
          final rejection.  These are all of the claims in the                        
          application.                                                                
               The subject matter on appeal relates to an oxygen                      
          concentration detector.  With reference to the appellants’                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007