Ex parte UCHIDA et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1999-0555                                                        
          Application No. 08/593,330                                                  


                    wherein the relationship between the length L  of                 
                                                                 1                    
               said heat-generating part and the distance L , in the                  
                                                           2                          
               direction of the length of said sensing element, between               
               the edge, on the side of the openings of the second                    
               level, of the openings of said first level and the edge,               
               on the side of the openings of the first level, of the                 
               openings of the second level, is such that 0.9 < L /L  <               
                                                                 1  2                 
               1.3 is satisfied.                                                      
               The references relied upon by the examiner’s evidence of               
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Yamada                          4,505,807           Mar. 19,                
          1985                                                                        
          Kato et al. (Kato)              4,512,871           Apr. 23,                
          1985                                                                        
          Yamakawa et al. (Yamakawa)      4,569,748           Feb. 11,                
          1986                                                                        
          Raff et al. (Raff)              4,756,885           Jul. 12,                
          1988                                                                        
          Ichikawa et al. (Japanese ‘848) 63-180848           Jul. 25,                
          1988                                                                        
          (published Japanese Kokai Patent Application)                               
               Claims 1-5, 7, 8, 10 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103 as being unpatentable over the Japanese ‘848 reference                
          in view of Yamada or Kato, and claims 6 and 9 are                           
          correspondingly rejected over these references and further in               
          view of Yamakawa and Raff respectively.                                     
               We refer to the brief and reply brief and to the answer                
          for a complete discussion of the opposing viewpoints expressed              
          by the appellants and by the examiner concerning the above-                 
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007