Appeal No. 1999-0578
Application 08/217,641
Wen Li et al. (Li), “Hydrogenated Amorphous-Silicon
Photosensor for Optically Addressed High-Speed Spatial Light
Modulator,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 36,
No. 12, December 1989, pages 2959-2964.
The following rejections are on appeal before us:
1. Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being anticipated by the disclosure of Fukushima.
2. Claims 2 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over the teachings of Fukushima in view
of Takimoto 2.
3. Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Fukushima in view of
Takimoto 2 and Hanyu.
4. Claims 8 and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of Takimoto 1 in
view of Li and Harwood.
5. Claim 30 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Hanyu in view of
Hartmann.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007