Appeal No. 1999-0578
Application 08/217,641
which exhibits a spatially uniform intermediate state between
bistable states, we do not sustain the examiner’s rejection of
claim 30, and a discussion of Hanyu is unnecessary. We do
note for the record, however, that the range of 10 -10 eqcm5 14
disclosed by Hanyu is not a misprint [note that the range is
repeated in claim 5].
In summary, we have sustained the examiner’s rejection
of claim 1, but we have not sustained the examiner’s
rejections of claims 2-4, 8, 29 and 30. Therefore, the
decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-4, 8, 29 and 30 is
affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
)
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
14
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007